Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41430355›Full record

ReviewGenes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society2025

Guidelines for the assessment and control of mutagenic impurities in pharmaceuticals.

Masamitsu Honma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prediction of Ocular Toxicity of Prostaglandin FMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Masamitsu HonmaNational Institute of Health Sciences (NIHS), 3-25-26 Tonomachi, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 210-9501, Japan. honma@nihs.go.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmaceuticals may contain trace impurities unrelated to therapeutic activity, which may occur as synthetic intermediates or degradation products. Among these impurities, mutagenic impurities are of particular concern, as even very low levels of exposure can increase the risk of cancer in humans. To address this issue, the International Council on Harmonization (ICH) developed the M7 guideline in 2014, which aim to provide a scientific and practical framework for the assessment and control of mutagenic impurities in pharmaceuticals. The M7 guideline has been updated twice, in 2017 (R1) and 2023 (R2), with the addition of addendum defining compound-specific acceptable intake levels and a comprehensive Q&A document to promote harmonized implementation. Recent cases involving N-nitrosamine impurities have highlighted the need for improved risk assessment methods due to their high carcinogenic potential. The latest revision of the M7 guidelines (M7(R3)) will introduce a new approach to consider the quantitative carcinogenic potential of N-nitrosamines based on their structural characteristics.

Indexed as

Acceptable intake (AI)Ames testIch m7 guidelineMutagenic impuritiesN-nitrosaminesThreshold of toxicological concern (TTC)

Identifiers

PMID41430355
PMCPMC12723853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.