Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41430346›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences2025

Successful re-administration after nano-liposomal irinotecan-induced severe hypersensitivity reaction: a case report.

Ryota Kanno, Yoshitaka Saito, Yoh Takekuma, Kazuaki Harada, Yoshito Komatsu, Mitsuru Sugawara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ryota KannoDepartment of Pharmacy, Hokkaido University Hospital, Kita 14-jo, Nishi 5-chome, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8648, Japan.
Yoshitaka SaitoDepartment of Clinical Pharmaceutics & Therapeutics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido University of Science, 4-1, Maeda 7-jo 15-chome, Teine-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 006-8585, Japan.
Yoh TakekumaDepartment of Pharmacy, Hokkaido University Hospital, Kita 14-jo, Nishi 5-chome, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8648, Japan.
Kazuaki HaradaDepartment of Cancer Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Kita 14-jo, Nishi 5-chome, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8648, Japan.
Yoshito KomatsuDepartment of Cancer Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Kita 14-jo, Nishi 5-chome, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8648, Japan.
Mitsuru SugawaraDepartment of Pharmacy, Hokkaido University Hospital, Kita 14-jo, Nishi 5-chome, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8648, Japan. msuga@med.hokudai.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNano-liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and levofolinate has been reported to extend the survival of patients with pancreatic cancer and represents an effective second-line treatment. Nal-IRI encapsulates IRI in liposomes modified with polyethylene glycol (PEGylation), which can lead to infusion reactions. Hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) to chemotherapeutic agents include both allergic and infusion reactions, which are difficult to distinguish. Severe HSR can be fatal; however, discontinuation of the suspected drug directly affects the treatment strategy. We report a case of severe HSR during the first nal-IRI administration, in which treatment was successfully continued with supportive management. CASE PRESENTATION: A woman in her early 80s with metastatic pancreatic cancer received nal-IRI + 5-FU + levofolinate as second-line treatment. Five minutes after the initiation of the first nal-IRI infusion, the patient developed a tightening sensation in the head, respiratory distress, convulsions, and loss of consciousness, with percutaneous oxygen saturation dropping to the 80% range. The nal-IRI infusion was immediately discontinued, and emergency management was initiated with intravenous infusion of hydrocortisone, famotidine, d-chlorpheniramine maleate, and oxygen administration, resulting in symptom improvement. Given the limited treatment options for metastatic pancreatic cancer and the patient's strong desire to continue therapy, we decided to re-administer the regimen with intensified management, increasing dexamethasone to 19.8 mg and adding famotidine 20 mg and d-chlorpheniramine maleate 5 mg. Furthermore, we adopted a three-step dose-escalation method. The infusion was started at one-third of the standard rate, increased to two-thirds after 30 min, and finally adjusted to the full rate after another 30 min, after confirming the absence of HSR symptoms. Consequently, the patient did not exhibit any signs of HSR, and the same administration method was continued for 11 cycles until disease progression.

conclusionsThe novelty of this report lies in presenting, for the first time, the detailed course and process by which treatment was successfully continued in a patient experiencing severe HSR upon initial nal-IRI administration, through enhanced supportive care tailored to the characteristics of the drug and stepwise dose adjustment.

Indexed as

AllergyComplement activation-related pseudo-allergyHypersensitivity reactionInfusion reactionNano-liposomal irinotecan

Identifiers

PMID41430346
PMCPMC12723823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.