Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41430317›Full record

ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2025

Perceived impacts of medications for opioid use disorder implementation on mental health services and substance use counseling in carceral settings: qualitative findings from 13 Massachusetts jails.

Ekaterina Pivovarova, Peter D Friedmann, Warren Ferguson, Benjamin J Bovell Ammon, Thomas J Stopka, Elizabeth A Evans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ekaterina PivovarovaDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA. ekaterina.pivovarova@umassmed.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3585-3604
Peter D FriedmannDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Warren FergusonDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Benjamin J Bovell AmmonDepartment of Medicine, Baystate Health, Springfield, MA, USA.
Thomas J StopkaDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Elizabeth A EvansDepartment of Health Promotion and Policy, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3478-9957

Funding

Massachusetts Justice Cooperative Opioid Innovation Network (JCOIN) Research CenterUG1DA050067 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI EVANS, ELIZABETH A., FRIEDMANN, PETER D · 2019 to 2023
$10.5M
NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA050067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough research on Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) in carceral settings has grown, it has largely focused on the implementation of medication delivery or on substance use outcomes in the community. However, the introduction of new programs or the expansion of treatment services in criminal legal settings can have both direct and indirect consequences on other treatment programs and correctional operations within jails. Mental health and substance use disorders frequently co-occur, and their psychosocial treatment components often overlap. We examined how the implementation of MOUD in all jails across Massachusetts impacted the mental health services operating within the jails and the requirements for substance use counseling alongside MOUD.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews (n = 47) and focus groups (n = 42) with staff from 13 county jails as part of an implementation of MOUD in jails study. Using deductive and inductive coding, all transcripts were double-coded and analyzed using a modified framework method.

resultsWe identified five key themes about the perceived impact of MOUD on mental health and substance use counseling services. First, MOUD implementation was perceived to reduce acute mental health crises, such as risk for suicide, and the demand on mental health services at intake to the facility. Second, staff perceptions about the effectiveness of MOUD as a stand-alone treatment influenced their decisions about the need for and interpretation of substance use counseling requirements. Third, the required components of substance use counseling created a need for additional staff, which exacerbated the existing shortage of mental health staff. Fourth, infrastructure limitations and privacy needs made the delivery of substance use counseling logistically challenging in jail settings. Finally, MOUD implementation increased interdisciplinary collaboration in some jails by requiring medical, mental health, and substance use providers to work together to resolve the needs of incarcerated individuals.

conclusionsAs jails aim to meet regulatory requirements for MOUD, they will need to manage potential staffing shortages, infrastructure constraints, and shifts in the mental health and substance use counseling services. Guidelines for implementing MOUD in carceral settings should also consider the unintended consequences of MOUD on other behavioral health services.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCounselingJailsMental Health ServicesOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMassachusettsPrisonsQualitative ResearchCarceralImplementationJailsMedications for opioid use disorderMental health servicesQualitativeSubstance use counseling

Identifiers

PMID41430317
PMCPMC12825220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.