ArticleBioData mining2025
Cross-cohort genetic risk prediction for Alzheimer's disease: a transfer learning approach using GWAS and deep learning models.
Article in BioData mining, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) represents a growing global health challenge, driven by complex genetic factors and diverse risk contributors. Currently, an estimated 55 million people worldwide are affected by dementia, with AD responsible for 60–70% of these cases. This paper explores the application of advanced machine learning approaches to predict AD risk using Genome-Wide Association Studies data from multiple cohorts, with a particular focus on transfer learning and feature selection techniques. We evaluate the performance of Wide and Deep Neural Networks and Multi-Head Attention in assessing their ability to generalise across datasets. As part of this, we explore knowledge distillation as a strategy to enhance model efficiency through improved generalisation performance in smaller architectures by transferring knowledge from high-capacity models to lightweight ones. Furthermore, the performance of these deep learning approaches is compared with tree-based ensembles, including Random Forest and XGBoost. Our experiments evaluate the generalisability, transferability, and efficiency of these models across different transfer learning scenarios. Findings indicate that aggregating multi-cohort training data significantly enhances predictive performance, highlighting the importance of data diversity in improving AD risk assessment. The proposed knowledge distillation approach enables the transfer of knowledge from a complex teacher model to a simpler student model, significantly improving performance. To enhance interpretability, we apply SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) to the student models, revealing cohort-specific differences in SNP importance and highlighting variants in genes such as ABI3BP and SYN3, both of which are linked to immune and synaptic functions in AD. The integration of SHAP enables transparent interpretation of model decisions and supports the identification of transferable genetic markers, reinforcing the clinical relevance of our framework in AD risk prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.