Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41430252›Full record

ArticleCell communication and signaling : CCS2025

Impaired docking and recycling of synaptic vesicles in inherited lysosomal sphingolipidoses.

Diego Zelada, Natalia Saldivia, Ashna Konjeti, Shayla Samano, Michael S Marshall, Rima Rebiai, Pearl Sutter, Zack Zurawski, Daniel Simchuk, Ruth Muchiri and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell communication and signaling : CCS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Diego ZeladaDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, 808 S. Wood St M/C 512, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. dzelada@uic.edu.
Natalia SaldiviaDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, 808 S. Wood St M/C 512, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Ashna KonjetiDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, 808 S. Wood St M/C 512, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Shayla SamanoDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, 808 S. Wood St M/C 512, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Michael S MarshallDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, 808 S. Wood St M/C 512, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Rima RebiaiDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, 808 S. Wood St M/C 512, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Pearl SutterDepartments of Neuroscience and Immunology, College of Medicine, University of Connecticut Farmington, Farmington, CN, 06030, USA.
Zack ZurawskiDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, 808 S. Wood St M/C 512, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Daniel SimchukLinus Pauling Institute, College of Pharmacy, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.
Ruth MuchiriLinus Pauling Institute, College of Pharmacy, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.
Richard van BreemenLinus Pauling Institute, College of Pharmacy, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.
Daesung ShinJacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA.
Maria I GivogriDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, 808 S. Wood St M/C 512, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Stephen J CrockerDepartments of Neuroscience and Immunology, College of Medicine, University of Connecticut Farmington, Farmington, CN, 06030, USA.
Simon AlfordDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, 808 S. Wood St M/C 512, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Ernesto R BongarzoneDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, 808 S. Wood St M/C 512, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. ebongarz@uic.edu.

Funding

Combined Neuroprotection and Metabolic Correction to Treat LeukodystrophiesR01NS065808 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI BONGARZONE, ERNESTO ROQUE · 2009 to 2018
$3.0M
CGT and ACD Inhibitors for SRT Treatment of Krabbe DiseaseR01NS127403 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI Ernesto Roque Bongarzone · 2022 to 2026
$2.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS065808NINDS NIH HHS R01NS065808NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS127403Rosenau Family Research Foundation N.A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive, memory, and learning impairments are common features of many lysosomal sphingolipidoses, yet the underlying synaptic mechanisms remain poorly defined. Here, we examined the impact of galactosylceramidase (GALC) deficiency on synaptic structure and function in the Twitcher (TWI) mouse model of Krabbe disease (KD). In vivo electrophysiological recording revealed significant cell autonomous reductions in paired-pulse facilitation and excitatory postsynaptic potential amplitude in hippocampal neurons of TWI mice. These functional impairments were accompanied by notable decreases in dendritic spine density, disrupted synaptic vesicle distribution, and reduced size of postsynaptic densities, affecting both excitatory and inhibitory synapses. Mechanistically, we found that psychosine, the pathological sphingolipid in KD, accumulated preferentially in presynaptic membranes and synaptic vesicles. Moreover, its higher biosynthetic rate in synaptosome fractions suggests local synthesis within the synaptic compartment. Deregulation of the SNARE protein SNAP25 and increased formation of SNARE complexes pointed to reduced vesicle docking and fusion at the presynaptic membrane. In vitro assays confirmed that psychosine disrupts synaptic vesicle cycling and SNARE-mediated fusion. Comparative analysis of other disease-associated sphingolipids-including gangliosides, sulfatides, glucosylsphingosine, globotriaosylceramide, sphingomyelin, and sphingosine-revealed distinct effects on vesicle trafficking, underscoring convergent yet lipid-specific mechanisms across inherited sphingolipidoses. Collectively, these findings identify presynaptic sphingolipid accumulation and impaired vesicle docking and fusion as shared mechanisms contributing to synaptic failure in several inherited sphingolipidoses, with potential relevance in adult-onset neurodegenerative diseases where lysosomal function is also compromised.

Indexed as

Leukodystrophy, Globoid CellLysosomesSphingolipidosesSynaptic VesiclesAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalGalactosylceramidaseHippocampusMicePsychosineSNARE ProteinsSphingolipidsSynaptosomal-Associated Protein 25GalactosylceramidasePsychosineSNARE ProteinsSphingolipidsSynaptosomal-Associated Protein 25GalactosylceramidasePsychosineSNARE complexSphingolipidosesSynaptic transmissionSynaptic vesicleSynaptosome

Identifiers

PMID41430252
PMCPMC12870824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.