SynthesisReproductive health2025
Experiences of midwives working in rural areas in Africa: a meta-aggregative review of qualitative studies on facilitators and barriers to effective healthcare delivery.
Synthesis in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMidwives are essential providers of maternal and neonatal healthcare, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, where they play a crucial role in managing obstetric complications and improving maternal and child health outcomes. Despite their significance, limited research has explored their lived experiences in rural healthcare settings, particularly the facilitators and barriers affecting their effectiveness.
methodsThis study employed a meta-aggregative approach guided by Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to synthesise qualitative research on midwifery in rural Africa. The main databases for the search included PubMed Central, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Ovid, and Taylor & Francis which identified eleven qualitative studies for inclusion.
resultsKey facilitators identified included motivation, social support, digital health innovations, access to training, and financial incentives. However, midwives face significant challenges, including psychological and emotional distress, lack of professional support, inadequate infrastructure, workforce shortages, financial constraints, and ineffective policies, which hinder their ability to provide quality maternal care.
conclusionMidwives’ effectiveness in rural healthcare relies on adequate support, resources, and motivation but is limited by psychological distress, poor infrastructure, and staff shortages. Therefore, strengthening rural midwifery requires targeted policy reforms, better working conditions, investment in infrastructure and digital health, financial incentives, and stronger legal protections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.