Observational studyBMC public health2025
Mid-upper arm circumference cut-offs identifying malnourishment and risk of mortality among patients with tuberculosis.
Observational study in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUsing Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) in place of Body Mass Index (BMI) may be preferable for identifying malnutrition in various situations, especially in resource-poor settings. The primary objective of this study was to determine MUAC cut-offs corresponding to BMI < 20 kg/m2, < 18.5 kg/m2, < 17 kg/m2 and < 16 kg/m2 in a cohort of patients with tuberculosis from West Africa. The secondary objective was to examine the prognostic value of MUAC cut-offs in predicting mortality at two months of tuberculosis treatment. The aim was to propose unisex MUAC cut-offs that could be used to identify malnutrition and to identify patients at increased risk of dying.
methodsThis prospective, observational cohort study was conducted from 2003 to 2022. Diagnostic accuracy of MUAC to identify BMI cut-offs was assessed for every 0.5 cm in the range < 20.0 cm to < 27.0 cm. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCCs), sensitivity (SENS), specificity (SPEC), false negative and false positive were determined. Cox proportional hazard model was used to examine the association between MUAC cut-offs and mortality.
resultsData from 2,098 patients were included. MUAC was found to be excellent in its ability to identify BMI cut-offs with AUROCCs close to 0.9. The MUAC cut-offs that best corresponded to BMI < 20 kg/m2, < 18.5 kg/m2, < 17 kg/m2 and < 16 kg/m2 were < 25 cm (SENS 75.1%, SPEC 83.0%), < 24 cm (SENS 75.1%, SPEC 80.0%), < 23 cm (SENS 77.9%, SPEC 83.2%) and < 22.5 cm (SENS 80.3%, SPEC 81.9%). Mortality risk significantly increased with MUAC values < 22 cm.
conclusionsMUAC cut-off < 25 cm was proposed to be used in place of BMI < 20 kg/m2 to identify malnourishment and MUAC cut-off < 22 cm was proposed to identify patients at increased risk of dying and thus in need of further attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.