SynthesisBMC emergency medicine2025
Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound for confirming endotracheal tube placement in pediatric acute care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Positive predictive value of tactile tracheal tube cuff ballotability above the suprasternal notch in detecting the correct positioning of the tracheal tube - A diagnostic accuracy study.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Endotracheal Tube Size in Children with Congenital Heart Disease.Annals of cardiac anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-care Ultrasonography for Endotracheal Tube Confirmation: Interpreting Evidence beyond Pooled Estimates.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for confirming endotracheal tube (ETT) placement in pediatric patients within emergency and critical care settings, compared with standard methods such as chest radiography and capnography.
methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was conducted from inception to May 2025. Prospective studies assessing POCUS for confirmation of endotracheal placement in pediatric patients (birth to 18 years) within acute care settings (including emergency departments, intensive care units, and operating rooms) were included. Data on diagnostic accuracy (Sensitivity, Specificity, Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, and Diagnostic odds ratio (DOR)), POCUS success rate, Confirmation of ETT placement, Time to adequate view, Reintubation rate, as well as baseline and summary characteristics of the studies were extracted. A bivariate random-effects model was used to pool diagnostic accuracy estimates, and heterogeneity and publication bias were evaluated. Sensitivity analyses were performed using the leave-one-out method to assess the robustness of the findings. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool assessed bias risk.
resultsTen studies involving 697 pediatric patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity of POCUS for confirming endotracheal placement was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.88-0.98; I² = 84.6%), and specificity was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.34-0.92; I² = 84.5%). The pooled DOR was 37.14 (95% CI: 6.17-223.47), and the AUC was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-0.99). Time to adequate ETT visualization was 45.8 s, the pooled procedural success rate was 97% (95% CI: 80-100%), and the reintubation rate was 2% (95% CI: 1-4%).
conclusionPOCUS is a highly sensitive, rapid, radiation-free, and feasible adjunct method for confirming endotracheal placement in critically ill pediatric patients. This integration could reduce the risk of complications associated with ETT misplacement, thereby improving patient outcomes. This meta-analysis finds that POCUS is a highly sensitive adjunct for confirming pediatric ETT placement. However, the pooled specificity was only moderate, and significant heterogeneity across studies in populations, settings, and techniques was a major finding. This variability currently limits its utility as a standalone test. Our results underscore the need for standardized protocols and operator training to improve specificity and consistency before POCUS can be more broadly relied upon for this critical task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.