ArticleBMC microbiology2025
Identification, pathogenicity, and virulence of the causal agent of bacterial scab disease on mango in China.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevalence of copper-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMango is an important economic fruit in China. As the mango cultivation areas continue to expand, symptoms of bacterial scab disease have been observed on mango fruits from orchards in Hainan Province, China.
resultsThrough a combination of morphological diagnoses, pathogenicity tests, physiological and biochemical characterizations, and phylogenetic analysis, the causal pathogens were identified as three distinct bacterial species: Enterobacter hormaechei, Pantoea dispersa, and Pseudomonas oryzihabitans. When compared to Xanthomonas citri pv. mangiferaeindicae XC01, the causal agent of bacterial black spot in mangoes, E. hormaechei produced more cell wall degrading enzymes (CWDEs), while P. disperse produced more cellulases but fewer proteases. Moreover, these two strains released higher amounts of extracellular polysaccharides (EPS). In contrast, P. orzihabitans could not produce cellulases or proteases, except for amylases. Additionally, we evaluated the motility capabilities of the three strains, including swimming and swarming motility. All strains showed lower swimming abilities than XC01. Specifically, E. hormaechei and P. disperse swam more slowly than XC01, and only P. disperse exhibited faster swarming behavior compared to XC01. Among the twelve tested chemical agents, albendazole showed the highest inhibition rates against E. hormaechei and P. disperse, with EC50 values (the concentration required for 50% maximal effect) recorded at 0.0002 mg/L and 0 0.0001 mg/L, respectively.
conclusionsThis study is the first to identify E. hormaechei, P. dispersa, and P. oryzihabitans as new pathogens of mango bacterial scab disease. These findings lay a foundation for future field control strategies against mango bacterial scab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.