Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41430086›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Fuzzy logic and deep learning approach for automated white blood cell detection and classification via multi-CNN feature fusion.

Taseer Ullah, Khalil Ullah, Parvez Khan, Olga Brikova, Alexander Voznesensky, Alexander Eroshkin, Ibrar Hussain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Taseer Ullah *Department of Computer Science and IT, University of Malakand, Chakdara, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, 18000, Pakistan.
Khalil Ullah *Department of Software Engineering, University of Malakand, Chakdara, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, 18000, Pakistan.
Parvez Khan *Department of Computer Science and IT, University of Malakand, Chakdara, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, 18000, Pakistan.
Olga Brikova *Department of Automation and Control Processes, Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University "LETI", Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197022.
Alexander Voznesensky *Department of Automation and Control Processes, Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University "LETI", Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197022.
Alexander Eroshkin *Department of Automation and Control Processes, Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University "LETI", Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197022.
Ibrar HussainQuality Enhancement Cell, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University, Sheringal, Dir Upper, 18050, Pakistan. ibrar@sbbu.edu.pk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

White blood cells (WBCs) are vital components of the human immune system, responsible for defending the body against pathogens and infections. The classification and detection of white blood cells (WBC) are indispensable for the diagnosis of hematologic diseases such as leukemia, but manual classification is time-consuming and susceptible to subjectivity. This paper introduces a new framework that integrates multi-CNN feature fusion with fuzzy logic-based Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) for automatic classification and detection of WBCs. The method combines aspects of DenseNet121, MobileNetV2, and ResNet101 to obtain varied morphological features, tackling intraclass variation and imaging inhomogeneity. A fuzzy EDAS model prioritizes the fused features for better interpretability and robustness in clinical decision-making. Using the Kaggle Blood Cell Images dataset of 8013 images of neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes and lymphocytes, the suggested approach obtained an overall precision of 99.79%, precision, sensitivity and F1 scores greater than 99.70% for all types of WBC. In contrast to individual CNN models (see, e.g., DenseNet121: 95.28%, ResNet101: 81.85%), the combined model performs much better, especially for difficult classes such as neutrophils. The fuzzy EDAS method also guarantees robust model classification in an uncertain situation and is therefore appropriate for clinical settings. It minimizes diagnostic delay, improves scalability in low-resource scenarios, and facilitates quick screening for blood diseases. Future development will address real-time implementation and verification on varied datasets to ensure generalizability.

Indexed as

Deep LearningFuzzy LogicLeukocytesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID41430086
PMCPMC12738841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.