ArticleScientific reports2025
Germination control by a hard seed coat: insights from a tropical legume.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Classifying seed dormancy is an essential task for plant propagation; however, several plant species lack information about the kind of dormancy the seeds have or inaccurate reports are passed on without an in-depth investigation. We investigated Copaifera langsdorffii, a widespread tropical species with several contrasting reports about seed dormancy in the literature, particularly on the role of their hard seed coat on germination control. The effect of aril (seed appendage related to the prevention of germination) and dormancy-break treatments on germination were evaluated. Seed coat permeability and the role of seed size and aril on imbibition have been investigated. Seed drying and storage were carried out to investigate a possible acquisition of dormancy. The influence of aril and seed scarification on seedling emergence was also investigated. The hard seed coat has juxtaposed palisade cells, a similar feature found in seeds with physical dormancy (PY). However, intact seeds had high germination (> 70%). Seeds had a slow imbibition pattern but did not prevent it. The aril hastens imbibition, but the seed size did not affect water uptake. Hilar region is the main permeable part of the seed coat, since the dye only enters the seed in this region. Reducing seed water content or storage did not make the seeds water-impermeable. The presence of aril or scarification decreased seedling emergence. Although PY is common in leguminous trees from seasonal tropical areas, it is not present in this species. This non-dormant seed has a main permeable area in the hilar region, which controls imbibition but does not prevent it. Low germination in arillated C. langsdorffii seeds is due to high seed death caused by fungi, not an imposed dormancy. The hard coat controls water imbibition and regulate germination timing in this tropical species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.