Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41430041›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Increased small impactor flux on the Moon as inferred from regolith thickness at the Chang'E-5 Region.

Mingwei Zhang, Bojun Jia, Vincent R Eke, Wenzhe Fa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mingwei ZhangInstitute of Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System, School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5985-3309
Bojun JiaInstitute of Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System, School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7218-6746
Vincent R EkeInstitute for Computational Cosmology, Department of Physics, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5416-8675
Wenzhe FaInstitute of Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System, School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China. wzfa@pku.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2969-5737

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 12173004National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 42525107RCUK | Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) ST/X001075/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of the small impactor flux on the Moon can provide critical insights into lunar geological evolution and the dynamics of the inner solar system. However, it cannot be directly deciphered from the observed populations of small craters due to their rapid degradation. Impact-generated lunar regolith records the contribution from historical impacts of various sizes and is particularly sensitive to sub-hectometer craters, providing a unique means to estimate the small impactor flux. Here we estimate the distribution of regolith thickness in the Chang'E-5 landing region (the youngest radiometric-dated homogeneous mare unit) through both statistics of fresh crater morphology and regolith evolution simulations using different impact flux hypotheses. The large median regolith thickness of 3.6±0.3 m derived from crater morphology can be attributed solely to a higher production rate of small lunar craters at sub-hectometer scales, which is 1.2-1.6 times higher than previously estimated. Such an increased small impactor flux may occur at ∼600 Ma and indicate recent asteroid breakup events, or could have persisted over the past 2 Ga, as a result of the preferential delivery of small impactors through the Yarkovsky and YORP effects.

Identifiers

PMID41430041
PMCPMC12722749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.