Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41430025›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2025

From Classroom to Clinic: A Scoping Review of Critical Thinking and Decision-Making in Orthopaedic Education for Medical Students and Residents.

Jamie Rosen, Prerna Kartik, Martinique Vella-Baldacchino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jamie RosenWarwick Medical School, Medical School Building, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4, UK. jamie.rosen@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-7505-6871
Prerna KartikKettering General Hospital, Rothwell Rd, Kettering, NN16 8UZ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1855-8881
Martinique Vella-BaldacchinoKettering General Hospital, Rothwell Rd, Kettering, NN16 8UZ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review examines existing literature on how orthopaedic education develops critical thinking and decision-making in medical students and residents. RECENT

findingsScopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and PubMed were searched for English-language studies published between 2015 and 2025. Twenty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Most involved residents (n = 19), fewer focused on medical students (n = 8), and one included both groups (n = 1). Five themes were identified: technology-enhanced learning, reflective and analytical practice, mentorship and professional development, curriculum design and integration, and assessment and feedback. Simulation and digital tools improved procedural reasoning and engagement. Reflection and mentorship supported analytical and diagnostic skills. Non-operative and outpatient decision-making were rarely explored. Orthopaedic education increasingly uses technology and active learning. However, structured development of critical thinking and decision-making remains limited, especially outside surgical settings and early training. Embedding reasoning, reflection, and mentorship in curricula may better connect classroom learning with clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Clinical decision-makingCritical thinkingMedical studentsOrthopaedic educationOrthopaedic residentsSimulation-based training

Identifiers

PMID41430025
PMCPMC12722595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.