ArticleUpdates in surgery2025
Fusion of machine learning models using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation for thymoma risk prediction: a multicenter analysis.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison Study of Inverted-Nipple Ureteroneocystostomy and Direct Anastomosis in U-Shaped Orthotopic Neobladder Reconstruction.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Comment on "Machine learning model for predicting a high comprehensive complication index following rectal cancer surgery".Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Comment on: "Dual-center development and validation of an immunoinflammatory-based preoperative model for predicting postoperative cachexia in colorectal cancer".Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Comment on: "Indocyanine green fluorescence in pelvic lymph node dissection during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial".Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- π-shaped anastomosis saves time yet may skew margin sampling in high tumors.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Thymoma, a tumor originating from thymic epithelial cells, can have its prognosis significantly improved through early risk assessment. We proposed a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation fusion model (FCE-FM) to assess tumor risk. In this retrospective study, we enrolled 286 thymoma patients from two centers between 2018 and 2024 and partitioned the study cohorts into a training set (n = 196), an internal test set (n = 50), and an external test set (n = 40). We developed a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation-based fusion model to predict tumor risk using demographics, radiomic and multi-planar deep features. The FCE-FM integrates five base classification models(Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, XGBoost, LightGBM, and GBDT) via fuzzy comprehensive evaluation(FCE), analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and triangular membership function techniques. Feature selection was performed sequentially using Spearman rank correlation followed by LASSO regression. A total of 26 deep learning features (5 transverse, 13 sagittal, and 8 coronal planar features) and 4 radiomic features, along with gender, were identified to construct the models. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy metrics.The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) methodology was utilized to rank feature importance. The FCE-FM model exhibited superior predictive performance, achieving AUC values of 0.982 (95% CI 0.964-0.996), 0.927 (95% CI 0.847-0.990), and 0.895 (95% CI 0.771-0.992) on the training, internal test, and external test sets, respectively. Corresponding accuracies were 0.949, 0.860, and 0.800 across these datasets. Notably, the model consistently outperformed five baseline classifiers in terms of AUC performance on both internal and external validation sets. The FCE-FM model exhibited high stability and accuracy in multi-center validation, demonstrating its robustness. This interpretable framework offers clinicians a reliable early warning tool for tumor risk assessment, enabling timely intervention to significantly improve patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41430016What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.