Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41430003›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of clinical oncology2026

Long-term progression-free survivors ("super responders") to olaparib maintenance in recurrent ovarian cancer: a multicenter real-world study (KCOG-G2101s).

Naho Fukuda, Tsuyoshi Takashima, Hidekatsu Nakai, Emi Yoshioka, Kimihiko Ito, Roze Taniguchi, Hiroshi Tsubamoto, Takashi Motohashi, Satoe Fujiwara, Takahiro Katsuda and 9 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Naho FukudaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, 1-14-1 Miharadai, Minami-ku, Sakai-shi, Osaka, 590-0197, Japan.
Tsuyoshi TakashimaDepartment of Pathology, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Hidekatsu NakaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, 1-14-1 Miharadai, Minami-ku, Sakai-shi, Osaka, 590-0197, Japan. nakai@med.kindai.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9994-2131
Emi YoshiokaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan.
Kimihiko ItoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan.
Roze TaniguchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Hiroshi TsubamotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Takashi MotohashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku, Japan.
Satoe FujiwaraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan.
Takahiro KatsudaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
Shin NishioDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
Hiroaki NaganoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Adachi Medical Center, Adachi, Japan.
Ryutaro NishikawaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya City University Medical School, Nagoya, Japan.
Kentaro KaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
Atsushi ArakawaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Kazuko SakaiDepartment of Genome Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan.
Eiichi MoriiDepartment of Pathology, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Kazuto NishioDepartment of Genome Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan.
Noriomi MatsumuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, 1-14-1 Miharadai, Minami-ku, Sakai-shi, Osaka, 590-0197, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 25K12732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPARP inhibitors have been shown to improve progression-free survival in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. However, their potential for long-term response and cure remains unclear in real-world practice.

methodsWe conducted a multicenter, retrospective study of patients with recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer who were treated with olaparib maintenance therapy in the Kansai Clinical Oncology Group. We analyzed clinical outcomes according to histological tissue type, platinum sensitivity, BRCA mutation status, and SLFN11 expression. Epithelial ovarian cancers were classified into type I (low-grade serous carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, low-grade endometrioid carcinoma) and type II (high-grade serous carcinoma, high-grade endometrioid carcinoma and undifferentiated carcinoma).

resultsA total of 72 patients were registered. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 12.0 and 42.0 months, respectively. Type II tumors exhibited significantly longer progression-free survival than type I tumors (p = 0.027). Among type II tumors, those with platinum-sensitive recurrence and a response to chemotherapy (PSR-R, n = 51) had significantly better progression-free survival than non PSR-R (p < 0.0001). Notably, eight PSR-R patients (15.7%) achieved greater than five years of progression-free survival ("super responders"), and all had no evidence of disease at the last follow-up. BRCA mutations and SLFN11 expression were not associated with progression-free survival or super responders.

conclusionsIn this real-world cohort, a subset of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer achieved durable, potentially curative responses with olaparib maintenance, regardless of their BRCA mutation status. When evaluating PARP inhibitor therapy, long-term progression-free survival should be considered a key endpoint.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOvarian NeoplasmsPhthalazinesPiperazinesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinFemaleHumansMaintenance ChemotherapyMiddle AgedMutationBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanNuclear ProteinsolaparibPhthalazinesPiperazinesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsSLFN11 protein, humanBRCAOvarian cancerPARP inhibitorRecurrenceSuper responder

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.