ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2025
Spatiotemporal position overlap disrupts feature binding in visual working memory.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined how task-irrelevant spatial and temporal relationships influence feature binding in visual working memory (VWM). Participants viewed two sequential memory displays, each containing two distinct objects. Objects were presented either simultaneously at different locations (thereby sharing temporal position) or sequentially at the same location (thereby sharing spatial position). On each trial, a test probe either matched one of the four memory items or combined features from two different items (non-match). Nonmatching probes were constructed to share spatial, temporal, or neither information with the original memory items. Feature misbinding occurred more frequently when the test probe shared either spatial or temporal attributes with the original items, with no significant difference in error rates between these two types. In Experiment 2, stimuli were presented either bilaterally or unilaterally to test whether spatial configuration influenced binding. While the bilateral condition replicated the findings from Experiment 1, the unilateral condition revealed greater misbinding for temporally overlapping items, suggesting that temporal information may take precedence over spatial information within the same hemifield. These findings demonstrate that the relative contribution of spatial and temporal information to feature binding in VWM is flexible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41429989What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.