ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
The Harms of Obesity in Abdominoplasty: Considerations of Methodological and Social Behavioral Factors.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional and Aesthetic Outcomes of Trans-Mastoid Decompression for Facial Paralysis After Retroauricular Hyaluronic Acid Injection.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Response to "The Harms of Obesity in Abdominoplasty: Considerations of Methodological and Social Behavioral Factors".Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byComments on "Patent Analysis on the Application of Exosomes in Wound Healing".2026 · No abstract available.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKlimitz et al. used the ACS-NSQIP database to conduct an observational cohort study of 1,778 cases on the impact of obesity on 30-day complications after cosmetic abdominoplasty; the study has limitations in four aspects: obesity definition, statistical model, sociodemographics, and preoperative weight-loss recommendations.
objectiveWithout introducing new data, identify the above four methodological issues based solely on the original report to provide directions for future research.
methodsRe-examined the publicly reported data and descriptions of the 1,778-case ACS-NSQIP cohort, focusing on: 1) sole use of BMI as the obesity criterion and absence of other adiposity measures; 2) unreported variable selection, multicollinearity, and interaction terms in the logistic regression; 3) omission of certain social determinants from the model; 4) absence of records on weight-loss history, weight stability, or effectiveness of weight-reduction programs.
resultsTheir findings highlight that obesity is an independent risk factor for certain complications, offering valuable insights for clinical practice, yet the four limitations may overestimate the effect or mask heterogeneity, finer risk stratification, sensitivity analyses across BMI thresholds, social determinants, and structured weight-loss trials are lacking.
conclusionFuture work should retain large sample size and rigorous statistics while adopting multidimensional obesity assessment, transparent modeling, inclusion of social determinants, and prospective studies documenting weight-loss processes to enable precise and equitable preoperative patient selection and counseling. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
41429974What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.