ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2025
Penile prosthesis implantation following conservative surgical treatment for penile cancer: anatomical and surgical considerations.
Review in International journal of impotence research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical considerations in prosthetic urology.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
- Top ten surgical tricks-penile prosthesis with corporal fibrosis.International journal of impotence research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Penile prosthesis implantation following penile cancer surgery presents a unique set of challenges. While penile sparing surgery, such as glansectomy and partial penectomy, aim to preserve urinary and sexual function, erectile dysfunction remains a consequence due to tissue loss and psychological distress. This review explores erectile function outcome following glansectomy and partial penectomy and provides practical framework for penile prosthesis implantation in this context. Specific considerations include anatomical changes, surgical timing and approach, prosthesis choice, patient counselling, and follow-up care. The selection of a penile prosthesis device should be individualized. Oversizing should be avoided, and downsizing should be considered, particularly in cases with significant corporal fibrosis. Moreover, inflatable penile prostheses are generally preferred, but malleable devices remain useful in selected cases, particularly following partial penectomy to facilitate unburying of the penis. Surgical strategies must account for altered penile and urethral anatomy to avoid complications such as urethral injury and prosthesis erosion. Post-prosthesis cancer surveillance remains essential and should adhere to current guidelines for penile cancer. A multidisciplinary approach and tailored surgical planning are essential to achieve satisfactory outcomes while maintaining oncological safety.
Identifiers
41429929What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.