Observational studyBritish journal of cancer2026
Exploratory analysis of gene aberrations and chemotherapy response: findings from a real-world database in Japan.
Observational study in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChemotherapy selection traditionally relies on tumor tissue of origin. However, since genetic alterations drive tumor behavior, it remains unclear if mutations can better predict response. We hypothesized that genetic aberrations might influence chemotherapy outcomes more than tissue origin.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 15,474 Japanese patients with solid tumors who underwent comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) and received cytotoxic chemotherapy. Genetic alterations and tumor origin were evaluated for objective response rate (ORR) and time to next treatment (TNT). Gene mutations were assessed across five chemotherapy classes: platinum-based, alkylating agents, antimetabolites, microtubule inhibitors, and topoisomerase inhibitors.
resultsGenomic alteration data alone did not surpass organ-based models in predicting response. For platinum-based agents, the gene-only model had an AUC of 0.575 versus 0.604 for the organ-only model. A combined gene-organ model yielded an AUC of 0.618 (P < 0.01). Certain gene-organ interactions were associated with improved outcomes. For example, APC-mutated colorectal cancer showed higher ORR and prolonged TNT (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73-0.92; P < 0.001) for platinum-based drugs.
conclusionsWhile genetic alterations alone did not outperform tumor origin as a predictor, incorporating both may improve exploratory predictions of chemotherapy response. These exploratory findings require prospective validation before any clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.