ArticleHealth promotion international2025
The tobacco industry at the health-environment nexus: a framing analysis of the UK 'disposable' e-cigarette ban.
Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Public health impact of disposable electronic cigarettes since 2021: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The sharp rise in 'disposable', or single-use, e-cigarettes in the UK-especially among young people-has raised urgent public health and environmental concerns. Manufacturers, including transnational tobacco companies (TTCs), have faced criticism for designing and marketing products that appeal to youth and have a considerable environmental footprint. In response, a UK-wide ban on single-use e-cigarettes was implemented in June 2025. While industry resistance to health policy is well documented, this is the first study to examine how TTCs and TTC-linked actors responded to regulation framed around both health and environmental objectives. We analysed 21 submissions to three public consultations from four TTCs and 10 TTC-linked organizations. Drawing on a taxonomy of framing strategies from an evidence-based corporate political activity framework, we explored how these actors sought to shape policymakers' perceptions of the problem and its solutions. TTCs and TTC-linked organizations positioned themselves as responsible actors aligned with public health and environmental goals while opposing the ban. Youth use and environmental harms were reframed as problems of individual noncompliance and enforcement failure. The ban was portrayed as disproportionate, procedurally flawed, economically harmful, and likely to increase illicit trade and tobacco use. Industry-preferred alternatives included measures targeting individual behaviour and product innovation. These findings add to evidence of a disconnect between TTCs' claimed transformation and their continued resistance to regulation. Close collaboration between public health and environmental advocates is needed to pre-empt and counter industry framing and influence, and to advance regulation that promotes public and planetary health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.