ArticleScientific reports2025
Pharmacodynamics of direct oral anticoagulants associated with post-endoscopic delayed mucosal resection bleeding of colorectal neoplasms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Protective Role of Aquaporin 4 (AQP4) in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: Yes or No?Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anticoagulant effects of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are influenced by their plasma levels and anti-factor Xa (FXa) activity. Delayed bleeding is a major adverse event associated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of colorectal neoplasms. However, the association between post-EMR bleeding and pharmacodynamics in patients taking DOAC remains unknown. This study investigated the association between pharmacological risk factors and delayed bleeding in patients receiving DOAC. This multicenter prospective trial in Japan evaluated the incidence of post-EMR delayed bleeding in DOAC users between April 2018 and May 2022 and determined the association of post-EMR delayed bleeding with plasma levels and FXa activity. The incidence of post-EMR delayed bleeding was 10.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.3%-18.0%). There were large individual differences in plasma levels and FXa activity for each DOAC. At the trough and Tmax, plasma DOAC levels and plasma level/dose ratios were significantly correlated with FXa activity. Multivariate analysis showed that high anticoagulant ability was a risk factor for post-EMR delayed bleeding (adjusted OR, 12.211; 95% CI: 1.081-137.922, p = 0.043). DOAC users with high anticoagulant activity may be at higher risk of post-EMR delayed bleeding from colorectal neoplasms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.