Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41429892›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Modulation of interhemispheric inhibition and motor learning by different intensities of bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy adults.

Thatchaya Prathum, Julien Dauguet, Irin Apiworajirawit, Benchaporn Aneksan, Siriwan Hoisan, Arruck Tragangoon, Vorasith Siripornpanich, Wanalee Klomjai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thatchaya PrathumFaculty of Physical Therapy, Neuro Electrical Stimulation laboratory (NeuE), Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand.
Julien DauguetLaboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale (LIB), CNRS, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Paris, 75005, France.
Irin ApiworajirawitFaculty of Physical Therapy, Neuro Electrical Stimulation laboratory (NeuE), Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand.
Benchaporn AneksanFaculty of Physical Therapy, Neuro Electrical Stimulation laboratory (NeuE), Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand.
Siriwan HoisanFaculty of Physical Therapy, Neuro Electrical Stimulation laboratory (NeuE), Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand.
Arruck TragangoonDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok, 10800, Thailand.
Vorasith SiripornpanichResearch Center for Neuroscience, Institute of Molecular Biosciences, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand.
Wanalee KlomjaiFaculty of Physical Therapy, Neuro Electrical Stimulation laboratory (NeuE), Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand. wanalee.klo@mahidol.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6294-0418

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) plays a crucial role in performing unilateral hand movements. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to modulate IHI and enhance motor learning, but the most effective stimulation intensity remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate how different intensities (1.0 mA, 1.5 mA, 2.0 mA, and sham) of bilateral tDCS affect IHI and motor learning in healthy adults. Twenty right-handed participants completed four randomized sessions, each involving bilateral tDCS application while performing a serial reaction time task. Resting-state electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded before and after stimulation to assess cortical activity. The brain symmetry index (BSI) was used as an indicator of IHI. The result demonstrated that 2.0 mA produced the most prominent changes in BSI, particularly in frontal and central brain regions. Correspondingly, reaction times improved during and after stimulation at 2.0 mA. Furthermore, the degree of BSI modulation was associated with improvements in reaction time. These findings indicate that 2.0 mA may be a choice for enhancing both IHI and motor learning in healthy individuals. This study also highlights the potential of using BSI as a biomarker to monitor the effects of brain stimulation and guide the selection of intensity in both research and clinical applications.

Indexed as

BrainLearningNeural InhibitionTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleFunctional LateralityHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMotor CortexReaction TimeYoung AdultBrain symmetry indexEEGHealthyInterhemispheric inhibitionMotor learningTranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41429892
PMCPMC12748741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.