ArticleScientific reports2025
Modulation of interhemispheric inhibition and motor learning by different intensities of bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) plays a crucial role in performing unilateral hand movements. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to modulate IHI and enhance motor learning, but the most effective stimulation intensity remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate how different intensities (1.0 mA, 1.5 mA, 2.0 mA, and sham) of bilateral tDCS affect IHI and motor learning in healthy adults. Twenty right-handed participants completed four randomized sessions, each involving bilateral tDCS application while performing a serial reaction time task. Resting-state electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded before and after stimulation to assess cortical activity. The brain symmetry index (BSI) was used as an indicator of IHI. The result demonstrated that 2.0 mA produced the most prominent changes in BSI, particularly in frontal and central brain regions. Correspondingly, reaction times improved during and after stimulation at 2.0 mA. Furthermore, the degree of BSI modulation was associated with improvements in reaction time. These findings indicate that 2.0 mA may be a choice for enhancing both IHI and motor learning in healthy individuals. This study also highlights the potential of using BSI as a biomarker to monitor the effects of brain stimulation and guide the selection of intensity in both research and clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.