Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41429881›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Efficacy of oral and rectal administration of human faecal microbiota transplant (FMT) in human microbiota-associated mouse models.

Petra Hanzely, Kristian Holm, Jørgen V Bjørnholt, Espen Melum, Johannes R Hov, Henrik Rasmussen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Humanizing Zophobas morio larvae microbiota for rapid screening of emerging decolonization strategies against multidrug-resistant bacteria.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Petra HanzelyNorwegian PSC Research Center, Division of Surgery and Specialized Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway. petra.hanzely@medisin.uio.no.
Kristian HolmNorwegian PSC Research Center, Division of Surgery and Specialized Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Jørgen V BjørnholtInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Espen MelumNorwegian PSC Research Center, Division of Surgery and Specialized Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Johannes R HovNorwegian PSC Research Center, Division of Surgery and Specialized Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Henrik RasmussenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

European Research Council 802544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiome has gained significant interest due to its association with immune dysregulation, allergies, autoimmune conditions, metabolic disorders, and inflammation-associated malignancies. Understanding underlying mechanisms requires appropriate in vivo models, such as human microbiota-associated mouse models to study the microbiota-host interactions. This study compared the efficacy of oral and rectal administration of human faecal microbiota transplant (FMT) from a single donor in C57BL/6J germ-free mice as these methods are often used interchangeably. Using 16S rRNA sequencing, we quantified colonisation efficacy in luminal and tissue samples from orally- (n = 6) and rectally- (n = 6) colonised mice. We detected 84 genera in the FMT sample, 17 of which were not transferred at all, while additional 7 genera were found exclusively in rectally-colonised mice. A significantly higher proportion of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) (33% vs. 26%; P < 0.05) and genera (32% vs. 25%; P < 0.05) were absent in orally- compared to rectally-colonised group. Some taxa showed different relative abundances in human vs. mouse samples (e.g. Alistipes and Bacteroides relatively more abundant in mice while Faecalibacterium considerably decreased). Beta diversity analysis revealed greater similarity between FMT and tissue samples irrespective of the administration route, with distinct separation of the tissue and luminal samples. Overall, rectal administration yielded more overlapping genera and ASVs with FMT, highlighting that it could have advantages compared with oral administration for microbiota establishment studies.

Indexed as

Fecal Microbiota TransplantationGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAdministration, OralAdministration, RectalAnimalsBacteriaDisease Models, AnimalFecesFemaleHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SColonisation efficacyGerm-free miceGut microbiomeMicrobiota–host interactionsOral administrationRectal administration

Identifiers

PMID41429881
PMCPMC12748712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.