ArticleScientific reports2025
Probabilistic functionalism as a limiting condition for robustness.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When should we expect behavioural phenomena to be robust? We argue that many phenomena of interest to behavioural scientists, by their very nature, involve manipulations of stimulus characteristics. If there exist contingencies between those stimulus characteristics and outcomes, the former will consequently constitute cues. People may then pick up on whether the cue is guiding them towards their goal or not and adapt their behaviour accordingly. On this view, the robustness of such phenomena is, at least partly, determined by the cue structure in each given setting. In an experiment, we demonstrate that the attraction effect and the default nudge obtain proportionally to how well the manipulated stimulus characteristics predict the superior option. A similar result is found under a more traditional rule learning manipulation. We suggest that the existence of cue-outcome relationships is an (underappreciated) limiting condition for the robustness of behavioural phenomena. We discuss the implications of this perspective for nudging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.