ArticleScientific reports2025
Using synthetic data for pretraining partial discharge detection in overhead transmission lines.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robust cross-domain blast furnace tuyere leak detection via few-shot guided simulation-to-real adaptation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Terabyte scale dataset for partial discharge detection in covered conductors via contact galvanic method.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate detection of partial discharges (PDs) in medium-voltage overhead transmission lines is critical for preemptive maintenance and avoiding costly outages, yet it is challenged by scarce labeled data and pervasive electromagnetic interference. This paper investigates a hybrid simulation-and-data-driven framework in which synthetically generated PD signals are used to pretrain deep neural networks and are subsequently fine-tuned on a limited set of real overhead-line measurements. The synthetic pipeline systematically varies PD repetition rates, amplitude distributions, vegetation-contact scenarios, and noise conditions, producing diverse time-series and spectrogram-like representations that approximate real operating environments. We conduct a comprehensive ablation study across multiple architectures-Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), a Vision Transformer (ViT), and a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network-and analyze their sensitivity to granular sweeps of synthetic-data parameters. CNN-based models decisively outperform ViT and LSTM counterparts on the spectrogram-based classification task, while ViT and LSTM fail to learn meaningful representation. For the successful CNNs, pretraining on carefully parameterized synthetic datasets-particularly those reflecting higher PD activity, such as our Datasets 3 and 4-consistently improves downstream performance on real data, boosting the Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) on imbalanced, cost-sensitive test sets by roughly 10-20% compared with training from scratch. At the same time, we show that poorly aligned synthetic data can degrade generalization, underscoring the need for accurate noise calibration and domain-aligned simulation. Overall, the results confirm that (i) architectural choice is pivotal for PD detection in overhead lines and (ii) well-designed synthetic data is a powerful, practical lever for achieving reliable and cost-effective PD monitoring when real labeled data are limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.