ArticleScientific reports2025
EEG classification for neurological disorders using frequency band deciles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Hybrid Random Forest-SARSA Framework for Resting-State EEG-Based Parkinson's Disease Detection With Temporal Decision Refinement.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- QuantumNeuroXAI: a quantum-inspired deep learning framework with explainability for brain signal analysis and neurological disorder detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) is a widely used non-invasive technique for monitoring brain activity, offering valuable insights into neurological disorders. Feature extraction methods based on signal processing approaches have been shown to be effective, but they tend to overlook the statistical properties of EEG signals. This study proposes a decile-based feature extraction method for EEG signal analysis, aimed at improving classification performance while maintaining simplicity and interpretability. The method was evaluated across multiple tasks, including the classification of Alzheimer's disease (AD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), Parkinson's disease (PD), and seizure detection, using three machine learning models: Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and LightGBM. Experimental results demonstrate that the decile-based approach, particularly when paired with RF and KNN, achieves competitive classification accuracy. Furthermore, the proposed method showed robustness to reduced channel counts, suggesting its potential relevance for low-cost, wearable EEG systems. While model performance varied across datasets, particularly for LightGBM, the results indicate that decile-based features provide a useful and interpretable representation for diverse EEG classification tasks. Further studies in larger and more heterogeneous EEG populations are needed to assess generalizability and establish the potential clinical applicability of early diagnosis and real-time monitoring of neurological conditions, especially in resource-constrained or ambulatory settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.