ArticleScientific reports2025
Multimodal machine learning for 5-year mortality prediction after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Potential profiles and associated factors of medication safety competence at home: a study in the older adults following percutaneous coronary intervention.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a cornerstone treatment for coronary artery disease, yet accurate prediction of long-term mortality remains a critical challenge due to the complex interplay of risk factors. Existing prognostic models rely predominantly on structured clinical data, overlooking the rich, nuanced information embedded in diagnostic imaging and procedural narratives. To address this gap, we present a novel multimodal machine learning framework that integrates coronary angiography video, unstructured procedural text, and structured clinical variables to predict 5-year all-cause mortality. Utilizing a large real-world cohort of 10,353 patients, we extracted visual embeddings via CLIP, textual embeddings via BioBERT, and structured features to construct a unified patient representation. Our trimodal LightGBM model achieved an AUC-ROC of 0.814, significantly outperforming single- and dual-modality baselines ([Formula: see text]). SHAP-based analysis revealed that unstructured data captured complementary prognostic signals, while structured variables provided concentrated predictive strength. This study demonstrates the prognostic value of integrating heterogeneous data sources and establishes a robust, explainable foundation for precision medicine in interventional cardiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.