Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41429850›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Sensitivity and tolerance analysis of single-layer MgF

Erfan Ghapanvari, Mostafa Salahshoor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Erfan GhapanvariSchool of Physics, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, 1684613114, Iran.
Mostafa SalahshoorSchool of Physics, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, 1684613114, Iran. salahshoor@iust.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anti-reflection (AR) coatings are integral to enhancing the performance of optical systems. This paper presents a comprehensive simulation-based sensitivity analysis of single-layer magnesium fluoride ([Formula: see text]) and silicon dioxide ([Formula: see text]) AR coatings on a glass substrate. The investigation focuses on the influence of critical design parameters, namely layer thickness, angle of incidence, and light polarization (s and p), on the spectral reflectance within the visible range. The results demonstrate that the optical performance of these coatings is strongly dependent on the aforementioned parameters. For s-polarized light, reflectance consistently increases with the angle of incidence. In contrast, for p-polarized light, reflectance initially decreases, reaching a minimum near zero at an optimal angle, a phenomenon associated with the Brewster angle. Furthermore, the study reveals that reflectance is highly sensitive to variations in layer thickness, particularly to thickness reduction. Quantitative sensitivity metrics are introduced to evaluate robustness against manufacturing errors. This analysis provides critical insights for the design optimization and the determination of manufacturing tolerances for AR coatings, aimed at maximizing light transmission in practical optical devices.

Indexed as

Angle of incidenceAR coatingLight polarizationManufacturing tolerancesReflectivitySensitivity analysisThin film

Identifiers

PMID41429850
PMCPMC12749774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.