ArticleNPJ science of food2025
Incorporation of mushroom powder: enhancing structure and flavor in pea-mung bean composite protein.
Article in NPJ science of food, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Valorisation of Edible Mushroom By-Products as Natural Flavour Enhancers in Plant-Based Foods: Mechanisms, Sensory Profiles, and Industrial Translation.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Mushrooms as Sustainable Protein Alternatives: Nutritional-Functional Characterization and Innovative Applications in Meat Analogs, Functional Snacks, and Beverages.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated pea-mung bean composites protein (PMX) produced via High-moisture extrusion (HME) with shiitake mushroom powder (XM, 0-30%). XM addition significantly altered the PMX 's structure and properties: hardness ranged between 1526 and 1642 g, texturization degree between 1.28 and 1.54, expansion ratio decreased to 0.814, and bulk density increased to 1.58 g/cm³. Water and oil holding capacities peaked (3.27 g/g and 1.88 g/g, respectively) at 20% XM. Molecularly, XM increased disulfide bonds (up to 8.42 μmol/g), modified ionic, and enhanced rheological properties (G'/G″) and thermal stability at 20% XM. FTIR indicated higher ordered secondary structures (56.6%) at this level, while SEM revealed a dense, anisotropic fibrous structure. Flavor improved as XM masked undesirable pea protein off-notes (e.g., 1-octen-3-ol) and increased beneficial aldehydes/alcohols (e.g., benzaldehyde) and flavor-active amino acids (glutamate: 3.21 mg/g). PCA identified 20% XM as optimal for sensory quality, beyond which natural aromas were masked. Overall, 20% XM synergistically optimized fiber structure, cross-linking, hydration, and flavor for good texture.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.