Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41429792›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

AI-guided transition path sampling of lipid flip-flop and membrane nanoporation.

Matthias Post, Gerhard Hummer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Martini 3 Limitations in Phospholipid Flip-Flop.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthias PostDepartment of Theoretical Biophysics, Max Planck Institute of Biophysics, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7804-2604
Gerhard HummerDepartment of Theoretical Biophysics, Max Planck Institute of Biophysics, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. gerhard.hummer@biophys.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7768-746X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We study lipid translocation ("flip-flop") between the leaflets of planar lipid bilayers with artificial intelligence (AI) guided transition path sampling (TPS). Rare flip-flops compete with biological machineries that actively establish asymmetric lipid compositions. By initializing molecular dynamics simulations near transition states, AI for molecular mechanism discovery (AIMMD) captures lipid flip-flop without biasing the dynamics. Four distinct mechanisms of flip-flop emerge, as encoded in neural networks trained on the fly to predict the commitment probability (or "committor") for a lipid to proceed to one or the other leaflet. Whereas coarse-grained DMPC lipids "tunnel" through the hydrophobic bilayer, unaided by water, atomistic DMPC lipids cross the membrane through spontaneously formed water nanopores. In an atomistic plasma membrane mimetic, cholesterol tunnels unaided by water, whereas PLPC lipids exploit both transient water threads and nanodroplets to cross a locally thinned membrane, as seen also in an atomistic bilayer of DSPC lipids. Remarkably, in the high (~660) dimensional feature space of the deep neural networks in AIMMD, the reaction coordinate becomes effectively linear, in line with Cover's theorem and consistent with the idea of dominant reaction tubes.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCell MembraneLipid BilayersCholesterolDimyristoylphosphatidylcholineHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMolecular Dynamics SimulationNanoporesNeural Networks, ComputerWaterCholesterolDimyristoylphosphatidylcholineLipid BilayersWater

Identifiers

PMID41429792
PMCPMC12780044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.