ArticleThe oncologist2025
Clinical and radiomics parameter prognostication in metastatic uveal melanoma patients treated with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy.
Article in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMetastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) has a poor prognosis, but hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) may improve outcomes in patients with hepatic metastases. To identify reliable prognostic factors for patient stratification and treatment allocation, we analyzed the clinical and imaging data from a large single-center cohort using machine learning (ML) models.
methodsPre- and post-first treatment clinical data of 235 patients with MUM treated with HAIC between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed using Cox regression to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and time to change treatment strategy (TTCS). Furthermore, ML models were trained on clinical and computed tomography (CT) data for endpoint prediction.
resultsPre-treatment multi-variate analysis identified elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (OS: 6.5 vs. 16.4 months, hazard ratio [HR]) = 1.87, P = 0.006) and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) (OS: 7.6 vs. 16.4 months, HR = 1.67, P = 0.012) as prognostic factors for inferior OS. Decreased albumin (TTCS: 1.3 vs. 6.1 months, HR = 6.26, P < 0.001) and elevated LDH (TTCS: 2.9 vs. 7.6 months, HR = 1.72, P = 0.011) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (TTCS: 3.7 vs. 6.4 months, HR = 1.65, P = 0.004) predicted shorter TTCS. Scoring enhanced the power of the prognosticators for OS and TTCS. Post-first treatment multi-variate analysis emphasized the importance of inflammation management and liver protection. ML models incorporating radiomics features from baseline CT imaging were not superior to models based on pre-treatment clinical data alone.
conclusionWe identified independent but synergistic prognostic factors for outcome stratification to guide treatment decisions and optimize patient management. ML-based radiomics features did not significantly enhance prognostic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.