ArticleThe oncologist2026
Attitudes toward large language model-based Artificial Intelligence systems as an information source for shared decision-making in radiation oncology.
Article in The oncologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImplementing structured shared decision-making (SDM) requires high-quality, reliable patient information. In radiation oncology, patients often have limited knowledge and misconceptions about therapy and side effects, affecting their decision-making. Large language model-based AI systems (LLMs) may help by providing evidence-based information in accessible language, but successful implementation depends on the willingness of patients and health care professionals (HCPs) to adopt these technologies.
methodsA survey was conducted among patients undergoing radiation therapy and HCPs between 03/2024 and 02/2025. Data was collected using structured electronic questionnaires (32 items for patients, 35 for HCPs). The survey assessed sociodemographic characteristics, the status of SDM in oncology, sources of information relevant to SDM, and current and anticipated LLM applications. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis.
resultsThe internet was the prime information source for patients (n = 400). Regarding current use of LLMs, a large discrepancy between patients and HCPs (n = 200) was observed (18.2% vs 69.5%). Although 77% of HCPs believed that patients will rely on LLMs in the future, only 29.1% of patients agreed. Most patients (65.8%) stated that even as LLMs improve, they will continue to trust physicians more; 46% of HCPs shared this view. Only 16.5% of patients were convinced that LLMs provide all relevant data for SDM in cancer care. Familiarity with technology was the strongest predictor of LLM use among patients.
conclusionOnly a minority of radiation oncology patients currently use LLMs, and many remain skeptical about their future role-contrasting with the more optimistic expectations of HCPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.