ArticleBMJ open quality2025
Developing an AI-driven multimodal approach to visualising resilient team performance: joint attentional engagement with gaze and speech in simulated emergency scenarios.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHealthcare team performance directly impacts the quality and safety of medical care. However, measuring the performance of teams is challenging and requires methodologies to investigate different contributing elements. This study proposes an AI(artificial intelligence)-driven multimodal approach to visualising gaze (ie, joint visual attention) and speech in medical team performance and examines how these might differ across medical expertise, using eye-trackers and our own automatic gaze annotation programme.
methodFour simulation sessions, two in Japan and another two in the UK, were filmed with eye-trackers worn by a clinician and a nurse. In each site, one session was conducted with an experienced pair (UK_Ex and JP_Ex) and the other with a less experienced pair (UK_LessEx and JP_LessEx). The scenarios were a difficult intubation in Japan and a urine infection, with a family member present, in the UK. The numbers of occurrences and the time lengths of joint attention and individuals' speeches in the four data sets were compared in total and in 15 s time ranges to see the correlations.
resultThe Ex pairs in both contexts paid joint visual attention more frequently and longer and spoke more than the LessEx pairs. In the JP_Ex, the positive correlation was found between the numbers of joint attention and the total speech durations (r=0.81). That indicates the team members verbally coordinated each other's attentional objects, which is termed coregulative attentional engagement. In contrast, in the UK_Ex, the correlation was negative (r=-0.70), where they visually monitored each other's actions while talking to the patient's family, which we call coinfluential attentional engagement. These tendencies were weak in the LessEx pairs.
conclusionAlthough the accuracy of automatic annotation (approximately. 40%-60%) should be improved before applying it to medical training, the research method could provide preliminary insight into elements of good team performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.