ArticleAsian journal of endoscopic surgery
Surgical Outcomes of Low Anterior Resection Using the Senhance Surgical System: A Single-Center Case Series.
Article in Asian journal of endoscopic surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Treatment in 2026: An Updated Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Beyond multiport DaVinci®: a closer look at less commonly used robotic systems in resectional colorectal surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Surgical Outcomes of Low Anterior Resection Using the Senhance Surgical System: A Single-Center Case Series.Asian journal of endoscopic surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe Senhance Surgical System is the second robotic surgical platform approved for laparoscopic procedures in Japan. It is unique compared to other systems, offering eye-tracking camera control, haptic feedback, and reusable instruments. Although its application in colon surgery has shown favorable outcomes, reports on its utility in rectal cancer surgery are limited. We aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent Senhance-assisted low anterior resection for rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: We retrospectively analyzed 16 patients who underwent low anterior resection for rectal cancer using the Senhance system between February 2020 and December 2022. Surgical indications included resectable rectal cancer without adjacent organ invasion or emergency presentation. Demographic data, perioperative outcomes, pathological findings, and recurrence were assessed. The median duration of the operation was 308.5 min, with minimal blood loss (median 0 mL). Conversion to laparoscopy occurred in 5 patients (31.3%) due to pelvic dissection difficulty. There was no case of conversion to open surgery. No Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2 complications were observed. The median duration of hospitalization was 8 (6-14) days. R0 resection was achieved in 14 cases, and R2 resection was performed in 2 cases with synchronous distant metastases. The median number of harvested lymph nodes was 22. Four patients (28.6%) experienced recurrence, excluding those with stage IV disease. DISCUSSION: Senhance-assisted low anterior resection can be safely performed with acceptable short-term oncological outcomes. However, its limitations in deep pelvic dissection and system setup require further investigation. Larger studies are needed to validate its utility in rectal surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.