Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41429101›Full record

ArticleVision research2026

The best stereoacuity is rarely at the fovea.

Ângela Gomes Tomaz, Adrien Chopin, Noelia Gabriela Alcalde, Dennis M Levi, Preeti Verghese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ângela Gomes TomazHerbert Wertheim School of Optometry & Vision Science, University of California Berkeley, USA. Electronic address: angela.gomestomaz@gmail.com.
Adrien ChopinSmith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Noelia Gabriela AlcaldeSmith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Dennis M LeviHerbert Wertheim School of Optometry & Vision Science, University of California Berkeley, USA.
Preeti VergheseSmith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN VISION SCIENCET32EY007043 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Suzanne MJ FLEISZIG · 1985 to 2026
$12.9M
A New Approach to Restoring Visual Acuity and Stereopsis in Adults with AmblyopiaR01EY020976 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BANKS, MARTIN S, BAVELIER, DAPHNE I · 2010 to 2020
$4.7M
ARBi - Assessment and Rehabilitation of Binocular Sensorimotor DisordersR01EY032162 · NEI · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI Peter John Bex, David G HUNTER · 2022 to 2026
$2.4M
SHORT TERM TRAINING--STUDENTS IN HEALTH PROFESSIONST35EY007088 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI FRISHMAN, LAURA J. · 1985 to 2025
$2.3M
Stereopsis and Suppression in Strabismus and AmblyopiaR01EY034370 · NEI · SMITH-KETTLEWELL EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI VERGHESE, PREETI · 2022 to 2025
$1.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY020976NEI NIH HHS R01 EY032162NEI NIH HHS R01 EY034370NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007043NEI NIH HHS T35 EY007088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stereoacuity, the ability to perceive depth from binocular disparity, is traditionally considered to be best at the fovea in typical human vision, and to decline with eccentricity. Previous studies have shown that when stereopsis is present in amblyopia, it is often coarse and comparable to stereoacuity associated with the peripheral retina in neurotypical controls, suggesting that it might be mediated by a non-foveal locus. Here we measured stereoacuity as a function of eccentricity in participants with amblyopia as well as controls with no history of abnormal visual development. We measured stereoacuity using random dot stereograms and targets that scaled with eccentricity, testing the fovea, and eccentricities of 2.5°, 5°, and 10° along the horizontal and vertical meridians. For 87.5% (7/8) of amblyopic participants, the locus of best stereoacuity was non-foveal. Surprisingly, 75% of control participants (15/20) also exhibited their best stereoacuity at non-foveal locations, with only 5 controls showing foveal superiority. Using stimulus parameters modified to improve foveal performance, we repeated measurements on a subset of controls whose best stereoacuity was non-foveal, but the best locus only shifted to the fovea in one participant. Stereoacuity measured at the experimentally determined "best locus" correlated well with standard clinical stereoacuity tests. These findings challenge the conventional view of universal foveal dominance for stereopsis, suggesting that the fovea is not invariably the site of best stereoscopic sensitivity, even in many normally sighted individuals. This has implications for understanding binocular vision in amblyopic and normal vision, and for interpreting clinical stereo tests.

Indexed as

AmblyopiaDepth PerceptionFovea CentralisVisual AcuityAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedVision, BinocularYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41429101
PMCPMC12938037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.