Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41428899›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Visualization of Experience Sampling Method Data in Mental Health: Qualitative Study of the Physicians' Perspective in Germany.

Julia C C Schulte-Strathaus, Theresa Ikegwuonu, Anita Schick, Maria K Wolters, Lena de Thurah, Michal Hajdúk, Adam Kurilla, Inez Myin-Germeys, Glenn Kiekens, Jeroen D M Weermeijer and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Julia C C Schulte-StrathausDepartment of Public Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg University, J5, Mannheim, 68159, Germany, 062117033734.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6138-5544
Theresa IkegwuonuCentre for Medical Informatics, USHER Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6633-8512
Anita SchickDepartment of Public Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg University, J5, Mannheim, 68159, Germany, 062117033734.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2043-0353
Maria K WoltersSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3369-3558
Lena de ThurahDepartment of Neuroscience, Centre for Contextual Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6102-0767
Michal HajdúkDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Comenius University Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7073-7564
Adam KurillaDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Comenius University Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4314-5026
Inez Myin-GermeysDepartment of Neuroscience, Centre for Contextual Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3731-4930
Glenn KiekensDepartment of Neuroscience, Centre for Contextual Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8747-3385
Jeroen D M WeermeijerDepartment of Neuroscience, Centre for Contextual Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6288-795X
Joanne R BeamesDepartment of Neuroscience, Centre for Contextual Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3630-0980
Lotte UyttebroekDepartment of Neuroscience, Centre for Contextual Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6510-3196
Rafaël BonnierDepartment of Neuroscience, Centre for Contextual Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1143-0711
Iveta NagyovaDepartment of Social and Behavioural Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik, Košice, Slovakia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9528-5234
Dagmar BreznoščákováDepartment of Social and Behavioural Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik, Košice, Slovakia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2780-145X
Daniel DančíkDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9532-9591
Koraima Sotomayor EnriquezDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4575-4837
Islay BarneDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9447-8889
Jessica GugelDepartment of Public Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg University, J5, Mannheim, 68159, Germany, 062117033734.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7898-1270
Ulrich ReininghausDepartment of Public Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health, Heidelberg University, J5, Mannheim, 68159, Germany, 062117033734.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9227-5436
Michel WensingMedical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6569-8137
Charlotte UllrichMedical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9757-913X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although the integration of self-monitored patient data into mental health care offers potential for advancing personalized approaches, its application in clinical practice remains largely underexplored. Capturing individuals' mental health outside the therapy room using experience sampling methodology (ESM) may bridge this gap by supporting shared decision-making and personalized interventions. Objective: This qualitative study investigated the perspectives of German mental health professionals regarding prototypes of ESM data visualizations designed for integration into a digital mental health tool. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with clinicians on their perceptions of such visualizations in routine care. Results: Using reflexive thematic analysis, 3 key findings emerged (1) ESM and ESM data visualizations were seen as valuable tools for enhancing patient motivation and engagement over the course of treatment; (2) simplicity and clarity of visual formats, particularly line graphs, were preferred for usability; and (3) practical concerns, such as workflow integration challenges centered on time constraints (psychotherapy session duration 50 min) and need for patient psychoeducation materials, influenced perceived utility. Challenges, including the risk of cognitive overload from dense data representations (eg, ESM mood-in-context visualizations), were raised. Conclusions: These findings underline the importance of designing digital tools that align with clinical needs while addressing potential barriers to implementation by exploring the opportunities and challenges associated with ESM visualizations.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelMental HealthPhysiciansAdultFemaleGermanyHumansMaleQualitative Researchdata visualizationexperience sampling methodmHealthmobile healthpersonalized carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID41428899
PMCPMC12721489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.