Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41428885›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Global vaccination coverage and disease incidence in cattle, pigs, and poultry.

Alec Gleason, Isabella Impalli, Justin Sheen, Aurelio Cabezas Murillo, Bryan T Grenfell, Simon A Levin, Thomas P Van Boeckel, Ramanan Laxminarayan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Climate change and antimicrobial resistance.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Global vaccination coverage and disease incidence in cattle, pigs, and poultry.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alec GleasonHigh Meadows Environmental Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0002-2646-2014
Isabella ImpalliOne Health Trust, Washington, DC 20015.ORCID 0009-0004-6596-4908
Justin SheenDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0001-7842-1364
Aurelio Cabezas MurilloWorld Animal Health Information and Analysis Department, World Organisation for Animal Health, Paris, France 75017.
Bryan T GrenfellDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.
Simon A LevinHigh Meadows Environmental Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0002-8216-5639
Thomas P Van BoeckelOne Health Trust, Washington, DC 20015.
Ramanan LaxminarayanHigh Meadows Environmental Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0002-1390-9016

Funding

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Foundation (CDCF) 21IPA2113462NSF CCF-1918628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination against livestock diseases is an effective method to prevent and control the spread of pathogens and reduce antimicrobial consumption and livestock production losses. Systematic data on global vaccination coverage could unlock opportunities to expand these outcomes. In this study, we estimate annual vaccination coverage and disease incidence for 104 cattle, porcine, and poultry diseases in 203 reporting countries and territories between 2005 and 2025 using data from the World Animal Health Information System, the Food and Agriculture Organization, and published literature. We provide 686,559 data points and further evaluate 11 diseases most widely targeted by vaccination programs in 2025. The vaccination coverage for global populations at risk of these diseases in 2025 is as follows: for cattle, 16.64% (95% CI: 16.63 to 16.66) against foot and mouth disease, 33.80% (33.43 to 34.38) against lumpy skin disease, 7.46% (6.71 to 8.81) against

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesPoultry DiseasesSwine DiseasesVaccinationVaccination CoverageAnimalsCattleGlobal HealthIncidenceLivestockPoultrySwineanimal healthimmunizationlivestockOne Healthvaccination coverage

Identifiers

PMID41428885
PMCPMC12772152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.