Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41428777›Full record

ArticleRevista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina)2025

[Nutritional and sedentary habits associated with suicidal behavior in Argentine adolescents: CHAID decision tree]

Alberto Guevara Tirado

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alberto Guevara TiradoUniversidad Científica del Sur.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: adolescent mental health is related to lifestyles. The objective was to analyze the factors of nutritional and sedentary habits associated with suicidal behavior in Argentine adolescents. Materials and methods: analytical and cross-sectional study based on questions from the Argentine School Health Survey, made up of 56,981 schoolchildren aged 13 to 17 years. The classification tree was used through automatic detection of chi-square interactions (CHAID), Odds Ratio (OR), prevalence ratio (PR), sensitivity (S), specificity (E), positive and negative predictive value (PPV and VPN). Results: the CHAID tree for suicidal ideation, planning and attempts included as associated factors: eating food high in fat and salt 2 or more times a day, not being physically active for 60 minutes a day on any day of the week and spending 3 or more hours a day in activities sitting or lying down. Based on the main nodes of the CHAID tree, adolescents with the characteristics of the 10-5-1 nodes had suicidal ideation 2.14 times more often than adolescents from other nodes (OR=2.14; 95%CI=1.78- 2.56), for suicide planning, nodes 7-3-1 had an association 1.78 times greater (OR=1.78:;C95%=1.61-1.963). For suicide attempt, nodes 10-5-2 had a 2.35 times greater association (OR=2.35; 95%CI=2.04-2.71). The specificity values were close to 100% in ideation (E=99.30%), planning (E=97.50%) and suicidal intention (E=98.60%). Conclusions: The consumption pattern of salty and high-fat foods, combined with physical inactivity, is associated with suicidal behaviors among Argentine adolescents.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorFeeding BehaviorSedentary BehaviorSuicidal IdeationSuicide, AttemptedAdolescentArgentinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleRisk Factorsadolescenthealthy lifestylemental healthsedentary behaviorsuicidal ideation

Identifiers

PMID41428777
PMCPMC12863392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.