ArticlePloS one2025
Numerical simulation and experimental research on optimization of pneumatic convey system in pneumatic seeder.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of pneumatic seeders for coated grass seed effectively addresses the challenge of seed establishment in arid and semi-arid regions, significantly contributing to the mitigation of soil desertification. However, during pneumatic seeder operations, high airflow velocities can lead to increased seed breakage rates, while low airflow velocities may result in blockages. To address these issues, this study employs both experimental and simulation methods to optimize the pneumatic conveying system of the seeder. A theoretical model of the pneumatic conveying system was developed to analyze the velocity field, pressure field, and seed trajectory within the flow field. The study focused on optimizing three parameters: Diameter of the throat outlet, diameter of the throat inlet, and the seed inlet angle. The key findings are as follows: (1) An optimized throat diameter of D2 = 58 mm is less prone to blockage; (2) Optimization of the neck ratio does not effectively mitigate the blockage issue; and (3) A seed inlet angle of α = 77° reduces seed breakage. This research elucidates the mechanisms of airflow and seed distribution within the pneumatic conveying system, providing solutions to minimize seed breakage and blockage, thereby enhancing the design and broader application of pneumatic seeders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.