ArticlePloS one2025
The effectiveness of Question Prompt Lists (QPL) in enhancing treatment outcomes for cancer patients among tribal population in Meghalaya: A quasi-experimental design.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCancer remains a leading cause of death worldwide, with a significant burden in India's northeastern states, including Meghalaya. Patients from tribal communities often face unique sociocultural and communication barriers that affect their engagement in care. Effective patient-physician communication improves satisfaction, adherence, and quality of life. This study aims to assess the consultation satisfaction and effectiveness of a Question Prompt List (QPL) in enhancing patient-physician communication and promoting informed decision-making among cancer patients in a tribal population in Meghalaya, India.
methodsA quasi-experimental design was employed involving 60 participants diagnosed with head and neck, gastrointestinal, or respiratory cancers. Participants were assigned to an intervention group that received the QPL and a control group that received standard care. Data on consultation satisfaction and patient feedback were collected across two follow-up sessions.
resultsThe intervention group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in multiple domains of consultation satisfaction, including physicians' responsiveness, patients' confidence in asking questions, understanding of disease and treatment plans, and discussions of financial aspects. In contrast, the control group showed no significant change across follow-ups. Patient feedback indicated high levels of agreement regarding the QPL's usefulness, clarity, and ability to facilitate meaningful communication.
conclusionThe QPL significantly enhanced patient satisfaction and engagement, demonstrating its effectiveness as a low-cost, culturally adaptable communication tool for oncology consultations among tribal populations. Integrating QPLs into routine oncology practice could strengthen patient-centred care and reduce communication barriers in underserved regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.