ArticleNucleic acids research2025
Structure-informed models for ionic current prediction in nanopore sequencing of expanded dna alphabets.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Solid-state nanopore sensing: the next workhorse of biophysical characterization.Nature methods · 2026Review
- Photoresponsive DNA steganography for secure information transmission by nanopore.National science review · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanopore sequencing enables direct, single-molecule interrogation of biopolymers and shows promise for analyzing not only DNA and RNA but also chemically modified bases, proteins, and other polymers. Expanded DNA alphabets, such as those found in xenonucleic acids (XNAs), open new possibilities for diagnostics, therapeutics, data storage, and engineered biology. However, robust sequencing strategies for these modified molecules remain lacking. While nanopore-based tools exist for some noncanonical bases, they often require extensive experimental calibration by measuring each base across many sequence contexts, which limits scalability and increases cost. In this work, we investigate computational methods for predicting the ionic current signals produced during nanopore sequencing of DNA containing noncanonical XNA bases, aiming to reduce the need for experimental calibration. We compare a sequence-based predictive model with two structure-aware approaches: one using graph-based molecular representations and another adapting a generative language model to molecular SMILES. Our findings show that while sequence context captures much of the signal variability, incorporating structural and chemical information improves predictive accuracy in specific cases. These results highlight the value of structural data representations and model design in scaling XNA sequencing, and suggest this framework could extend to modeling ionic currents from other complex biomolecules, such as proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.