Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41428729›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2025

Structure-informed models for ionic current prediction in nanopore sequencing of expanded dna alphabets.

Ashley Stephenson, Jayson Sumabat, Hinako Kawabe, Sidharth Lakshmanan, Hyo Joong Kim, Yubing Li, Jorge A Marchand, Jeff Nivala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ashley StephensonSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, 3800 E Stevens Way NE, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0671-9986
Jayson SumabatDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, 3781 Okanogan Ln NE, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.
Hinako KawabeDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, 3781 Okanogan Ln NE, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.
Sidharth LakshmananSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, 3800 E Stevens Way NE, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.
Hyo Joong KimFoundation For Applied Molecular Evolution (FfAME), 13709 Progress Blvd., Alachua, FL 32615, United States.
Yubing LiFoundation For Applied Molecular Evolution (FfAME), 13709 Progress Blvd., Alachua, FL 32615, United States.
Jorge A MarchandDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, 3781 Okanogan Ln NE, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.
Jeff NivalaSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, 3800 E Stevens Way NE, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.

Funding

National Science Foundation 2236969NSF 2236969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanopore sequencing enables direct, single-molecule interrogation of biopolymers and shows promise for analyzing not only DNA and RNA but also chemically modified bases, proteins, and other polymers. Expanded DNA alphabets, such as those found in xenonucleic acids (XNAs), open new possibilities for diagnostics, therapeutics, data storage, and engineered biology. However, robust sequencing strategies for these modified molecules remain lacking. While nanopore-based tools exist for some noncanonical bases, they often require extensive experimental calibration by measuring each base across many sequence contexts, which limits scalability and increases cost. In this work, we investigate computational methods for predicting the ionic current signals produced during nanopore sequencing of DNA containing noncanonical XNA bases, aiming to reduce the need for experimental calibration. We compare a sequence-based predictive model with two structure-aware approaches: one using graph-based molecular representations and another adapting a generative language model to molecular SMILES. Our findings show that while sequence context captures much of the signal variability, incorporating structural and chemical information improves predictive accuracy in specific cases. These results highlight the value of structural data representations and model design in scaling XNA sequencing, and suggest this framework could extend to modeling ionic currents from other complex biomolecules, such as proteins.

Indexed as

DNANanoporesNanopore SequencingSequence Analysis, DNANucleic Acid ConformationDNA

Identifiers

PMID41428729
PMCPMC12721330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.