Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41428709›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025

Molecular detection of Histoplasma capsulatum in environmental samples collected from South African caves.

Tsidiso G Maphanga, Rutendo E Mapengo, Oresti Ventouras, Serisha D Naicker, Nelesh P Govender

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tsidiso G MaphangaWits Mycology Division, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-6117-4309
Rutendo E MapengoWits Mycology Division, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Oresti VentourasSubterranean Ecosystems Conservation Organization, Cape Town, South Africa.
Serisha D NaickerWits Mycology Division, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Nelesh P GovenderWits Mycology Division, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Funding

Southern African-Pittsburgh Public Health Genomic Epidemiology Training Program (SAPPHGenE)D43TW011255 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Lee H Harrison, Anne von Gottberg · 2019 to 2026
$1.7M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW011255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHistoplasma capsulatum naturally occurs in cave soil enriched by bat guano. South African caves are documented as probable sources of exposure for speleologists, casual visitors, or guano miners with several outbreaks of acute pulmonary histoplasmosis reported since 1977. Sporadic cases of disseminated histoplasmosis occur in South Africans living with advanced HIV disease. However, detection from the environment has not been confirmed. We used molecular assays to detect and confirm the presence of H. capsulatum in regularly-explored caves.

methodsEnvironmental samples were collected by a speleologist from seven South African caves from December 2020 to September 2021 in the Gauteng, Northern Cape and Western Cape provinces of South Africa and stored at 2-8 °C. DNA was extracted directly from the samples using DNeasy PowerSoil Pro Kit. In-house internal transcribed spacer (ITS) panfungal polymerase chain reaction (PCR), pan-dimorphic reverse transcriptase-quantitative (RT-q) PCR and nested Hc100 PCR assays were used to detect H. capsulatum. Sequence identity was confirmed using the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) BLAST tool following Sanger sequencing of the Hc100 nested-PCR product.

resultsH. capsulatum was detected in five of the seven caves. Of 56 samples tested, 18 (32%) were positive from three caves in Gauteng Province [cave 1 (3/10); cave 2 (7/10); cave 3 (5/10)], one cave in the Western Cape Province [cave 4 (2/5)] and one cave in the Northern Cape Province [cave 6 (1/10)]. These samples were positive either by RT-qPCR or Hc100 PCR assays. Both RT-qPCR and Hc100 PCR assays were positive in 21% (12/56) samples. Seven percent (4/56) of samples were only RT-qPCR assay-positive and 4% (2/56) only Hc100 PCR-positive. Phylogenetic analysis of the Hc100 gene product from 10 samples (with good-quality sequences) identified four groups. Group 1 consisted of three samples from caves 1, 3, and 6 (Gauteng/ Northern Cape); Group 2 included four samples from caves 1, 2, and 3 (Gauteng); Group 3 had one sample from cave 4 (Western Cape); and Group 4 included two samples from caves 1 and 3 (Gauteng). None of the 56 samples tested positive with the ITS PCR assay.

conclusionsH. capsulatum is probably present in several regularly-explored caves with bat populations. This finding should be confirmed by culture. The RT-qPCR and the Hc100 PCR assays could be useful tools for wider environmental surveillance.

Indexed as

CavesHistoplasmaHistoplasmosisAnimalsChiropteraDNA, FungalHumansPhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionSouth AfricaDNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID41428709
PMCPMC12755807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.