Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41428708›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Variability of a job search indicator induced by operationalization decisions when using digital traces from a meter.

Carlos Ochoa, Melanie Revilla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carlos OchoaRECSM, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2297-6202
Melanie RevillaRECSM, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8026-8319

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital traces -particularly metered data-offer researchers a valuable alternative to surveys for studying online behavior. However, because the concepts being measured are not directly observable in the data, their operationalization requires multiple decisions-for example, which events (e.g., visited websites) represent the concepts and which metrics (e.g., visit counts or time spent) capture their intensity. Using metered data from 600 Netquest panelists in Spain, this study investigates how operationalization choices affect the measurement of job search intensity. By varying metrics-combinations of measurement targets (such as sessions on job platforms or job offer pages) and measurement types (such as visit counts or time spent)-along with other factors (e.g., methods for separating search activity into spells or handling outliers), the study explores 10,080 operationalizations. Results reveal significant variability, with correlations between measurement pairs ranging from 0.14 to 0.91. Metrics sharing the same measurement target (e.g., sessions, job offer pages) demonstrate stronger convergent validity than those sharing only the same measurement type (e.g., time or visits). Other operationalization factors, such as session segmentation methods, also influence results, though less than metric choice. Importantly, operationalization decisions can affect substantive findings.

Indexed as

Decision MakingInternetHumansSpainSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41428708
PMCPMC12721509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.