ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025
Dairy farmers have minimal knowledge of bovine tuberculosis: A cross-sectional study in Bhutan.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is a chronic disease of cattle and the leading cause of zoonotic tuberculosis. In Bhutan, there is no dedicated program for bTB despite the country being situated in the bTB enzootic region, where a large section of population relies on cattle and raw milk and, dairy products are widely consumed.To contribute to the design of future education, surveillance, mitigation, and control programs, we investigated the knowledge, attitudes, and practices relevant to bTB among dairy farmers. We surveyed 264 farmers in Thimphu, Paro, and Haa Dzongkhags. These farmers contribute to supplying the eight milk outlets in the capital, Thimphu. We found that only 11 farmers (4.2%; confidence interval 95%: 2.1% - 7.3%) were aware that bTB existed, and only five of them (1.9%; CI 95%: 0.6% - 4.3%) were aware that bTB is a zoonosis. Risk perception and practice followed a gradient of variation from Thimphu to Haa, but overall, we found a correlation between bTB risk perception for animals and humans. Farmers and traders, along with the consumption of meat and sick animals, were perceived as occupations and activities involving the highest risk of zoonotic infection. Contact with animals entering the herd and with neighbouring cattle were perceived as the highest risk for animal infection. Most farmers in Haa consume raw milk and dairy products they produced by themselves, whereas farmers in Paro and Thimphu prefer powdered milk. Using generalised low-rank models and k-means clustering, we found that dzongkhag of residence and attitudes toward zoonotic infection prevention explained most variability in the data. The severe knowledge deficits about bTB are particularly concerning given the zoonosis is present in Bhutan, is prevalent in neighbouring countries, and negatively affects cattle health and well-being, diminishing fertility, milk, and overall productivity, ultimately impacting farmers' livelihoods and undermining Bhutan's nutritional and economic reliance on this sector. Urgent short and mid-term activities should be prioritised to identify bTB high-risk areas, educate farmers, and mitigate bTB impacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.