ArticlePloS one2025
Ratio maps of T1w/T2w MRI signal intensity do not improve deep-learning segmentation of pediatric brain tumors.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep learning strategies for semantic segmentation of pediatric brain tumors in multiparametric MRI.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionT1w/T2w ratio mapping, combining voxel-wise signal intensities in T1-weighted (T1w) and T2-weighted (T2w) structural MRI, has been used to investigate cortical architecture in the brain, but has also shown promise in tissue discrimination, even in tumor tissue. Given this, we investigate whether the inclusion of these established T1w/T2w ratio maps, or a similar T1w - T2w combined map, can improve performance on a novel task; automated segmentation of tumor tissue in pediatric brain tumor cases from the BraTS-PED 2024 dataset.
methodsUsing the BraTS-PED 2024 dataset (n = 261 pediatric brain tumor patients), we trained and evaluated (with a five-fold cross validation approach) segmentation performance across tumor subregions with nnU-Net, a state-of-the-art deep learning framework. Multiple model configurations were compared; a) a standard baseline model using typical multiparametric MRI (mpMRI, including T1w, T2w, FLAIR and contrast-enhanced T1w MRI) as input modalities and b) an experimental configuration using standard mpMRI inputs plus a T1w/T2w ratio map. Performance was assessed using Dice scores and statistical comparisons with Bonferroni correction to assess he direct 'added benefit' of the T1w/T2w ratio maps.
resultsInclusion of T1w/T2w ratio or the combined maps did not significantly improve segmentation accuracy across any tumor subregion. While minor increases in ET segmentation were observed with the ratio map, these were not statistically significant. Combined maps showed marginal improvements in ET and NET segmentation but reduced performance in CC and ED regions.
conclusionsOverall, we demonstrate that T1w/T2w ratio maps do not improve deep learning models for segmenting pediatric brain tumor subregions using nnU-Net, despite their strong biophysical basis for tissue discrimination. T hese findings suggest that such data augmentation strategies may not provide added value and highlight the importance of rigorous validation in medical imaging research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.