ArticlePloS one2025
General practitioners' experiences of managing low back pain in primary care in Ireland: A qualitative phenomenological study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLow back pain (LBP) is one of the most common symptoms presented in general practitioner (GP) consultations worldwide and is a leading cause of disability. Despite LBP clinical guidelines advocating for non-pharmacological, primary care-based management, management often diverges from recommendations.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to explore the lived experiences of GPs' management of LBP in primary care, using a qualitative method.
methodsTwelve GPs across multiple Irish primary care settings were interviewed using a semi-structured guide developed in line with international LBP management guidelines. Interviews were conducted either in-person or via Zoom and audio recorded. The interviews were transcribed and the data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsThree key themes were identified. LBP is a common issue with increasing patient complexity. GPs frequently encounter LBP in patients with multimorbidity, particularly in lower socioeconomic settings, complicating diagnosis and management. Secondly, GPs spoke about the complexity of managing LBP. Challenges identified included patient pressure for imaging, limited utility of available imaging, variability in medication prescribing, and patient misunderstandings of physiotherapy. The final theme discussed how the current healthcare system is not fit for purpose. Structural issues such as inequitable access to physiotherapy and the two-tiered public/private healthcare system were cited as major barriers. GPs expressed a need for better resources, education, and support to align care with clinical guidelines. DISCUSSION: The management of LBP in Irish primary care is deeply affected by systemic inequities. Both system-level reform-particularly around equitable access to care-and the development of supportive and accessible resources are needed to empower GPs to successfully manage this significant public health issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.