ArticlePloS one2025
Key soil properties governing Cr(VI) retention in 16 natural soils: A comprehensive geochemical and statistical analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hexavalent Chromium (Cr(VI)) contamination in soils poses significant ecological risks due to its mobility and toxicity, with retention mechanisms governed by interactions between soil properties and Cr(VI). However, the quantitative roles of key soil parameters in Cr(VI) retention remain poorly resolved, particularly across diverse soil types. This study investigated Cr(VI) retention behaviors in 16 Chinese soils (15 types) through batch experiments, isothermal adsorption model, correlation analysis and path analysis. The results showed that the retention of Cr(VI) in acidic soils was significantly higher than in alkaline soils. Acidic soils (pH < 5.4) with higher concentrations of exchangeable Fe(II) (Exch-Fe(II)) exhibited strong Cr(VI) holding capabilities,while Alkaline soils (pH > 7.3) with highest content of CaCO3 show negligible Cr(VI) reactions.Cr(VI) retention was high at soil pH values below approximately 5.5, but declined sharply at higher pH values. The Langmuir model was only suitable for describing acidic soils (pH < 5.4), while the Freundlich equation was applicable to all soils. Correlation analysis revealed that soil pH, the content of soil organic matters(SOM), Exch-Fe(II), complexed iron (Com-Fe), and clay were significantly related to the Cr(VI) retention (p < 0.01), whereas the CaCO3 content was negatively related to the Cr(VI) retention (p < 0.05).Path analysis revealed that soil pH was the most important direct factor, followed by Exch-Fe(II), Com-Fe, clay, in determining Cr(VI) retention in natural soil. CEC and CaCO3 content had only limited directly effects on the Cr(VI) retention. Additionally, The content of SOM, Amorphous iron oxides(Amo-Fe), and Easily reducible manganese(Er-Mn) content had little directly effect on Cr(VI) retention. To validate these findings, Cr(VI) retention was measured in all soils after adjusting their pH to 4.3, 6, and 8. The results highlighted soil pH and Exch-Fe(II) content were the most decisive factors for evaluating Cr(VI) retention in natrual soils,whereas SOM content was an unreliable parameter for assessing this process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.