Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41428528›Full record

ReviewThe American psychologist2025

Translating neurophysiological biomarkers into clinical tools: A psychometric blueprint illustrated with the error-related negativity.

Peter E Clayson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American psychologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Beyond classical metrics: Generalizability theory across psychophysiological modalities.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

PsyRAT: Extensible Open-Source Software for Applying Generalizability Theory to Assess Psychometric Reliability of Trial-Wise Scores and Optimize Tasks for RDoCR01MH128208 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI Peter Eugene Clayson · 2022 to 2026
$3.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH128208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical neuroscience seeks reliable biomarkers for psychiatric diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment, but translation has stalled because replication is inconsistent, theory is incomplete, and links to psychological processes are unclear. These shortcomings largely stem from inadequate attention to psychometric principles. This review focuses on event-related potentials and shows how assessment of reliability and validity, as well as optimization and standardization, can support the development of actionable biomarkers. Biomarker development can falter when measures are adapted from basic research protocols that emphasize within-person contrasts and minimize between-person variance, a strategy poorly suited to examining individual differences. Many biomarkers show poor internal and test-retest reliability when used to distinguish individuals or predict clinical outcomes, especially in patient populations in which data are more variable. Furthermore, the validity of any biological measure depends on well-articulated causal models linking brain activity to psychological phenomena. A roadmap, guided by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the National Institutes of Health Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools resource, aligns psychometric work with analytic validation, clinical validation, and context-of-use qualification. This framework is illustrated with the error-related negativity (ERN), an event-related potential that has progressed from basic cognitive research to a prognostic biomarker for anxiety. Priorities for ERN development include meeting high reliability thresholds, optimizing tasks and pipelines for clinical samples, and harmonizing acquisition and analysis to support cross-site generalization. Although the focus of the review is on ERN, the principles apply broadly to all biological measures. The proposed process for guiding biomarker evaluation through psychometrics will pave the way for better selection of biomarkers, ultimately improving their clinical utility in precision medicine. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

BiomarkersEvoked PotentialsMental DisordersPsychometricsTranslational Research, BiomedicalElectroencephalographyHumansReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID41428528
PMCPMC12724633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.