ReviewThe American psychologist2025
Translating neurophysiological biomarkers into clinical tools: A psychometric blueprint illustrated with the error-related negativity.
Review in The American psychologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reaction Time Variability and Electrophysiological Indices of Performance Monitoring in Youths With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.Psychophysiology · 2026Article
- Thematic structure of clinically oriented prefrontal function assessment and intervention research: a keyword network analysis.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Trial-By-Trial Changes in Neural Indices of Performance Monitoring Uniquely Correspond to Behavioral Adjustments During a Flanker Task.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Beyond classical metrics: Generalizability theory across psychophysiological modalities.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2026Review
- Mapping the Digital Mind: A Meta-Analysis of EEG Biomarkers in Cognition, Emotion, and Mental Health.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Quantitative EEG Assessment of Dependence-Related Neurophysiological Patterns Using Rule- and Score-Based Modeling in Substance Use Disorders.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Quantitative electroencephalography as a next-generation tool in neurodiagnostics: significance, clinical applications, and practical interpretative frameworks.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Probiotics in irritable bowel syndrome: strain-specific effects, diet, and biomarker timing.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical neuroscience seeks reliable biomarkers for psychiatric diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment, but translation has stalled because replication is inconsistent, theory is incomplete, and links to psychological processes are unclear. These shortcomings largely stem from inadequate attention to psychometric principles. This review focuses on event-related potentials and shows how assessment of reliability and validity, as well as optimization and standardization, can support the development of actionable biomarkers. Biomarker development can falter when measures are adapted from basic research protocols that emphasize within-person contrasts and minimize between-person variance, a strategy poorly suited to examining individual differences. Many biomarkers show poor internal and test-retest reliability when used to distinguish individuals or predict clinical outcomes, especially in patient populations in which data are more variable. Furthermore, the validity of any biological measure depends on well-articulated causal models linking brain activity to psychological phenomena. A roadmap, guided by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the National Institutes of Health Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools resource, aligns psychometric work with analytic validation, clinical validation, and context-of-use qualification. This framework is illustrated with the error-related negativity (ERN), an event-related potential that has progressed from basic cognitive research to a prognostic biomarker for anxiety. Priorities for ERN development include meeting high reliability thresholds, optimizing tasks and pipelines for clinical samples, and harmonizing acquisition and analysis to support cross-site generalization. Although the focus of the review is on ERN, the principles apply broadly to all biological measures. The proposed process for guiding biomarker evaluation through psychometrics will pave the way for better selection of biomarkers, ultimately improving their clinical utility in precision medicine. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.