ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Tai Chi Chuan Auxiliary Training Systems in Health and Rehabilitation: Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Global research trends of TCM-based nonpharmacologic interventions in breast cancer supportive care: a bibliometric analysis (2000-2025).Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Can geriatric expertise be codified? Why geriatric judgment extends beyond algorithms.European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tai Chi Chuan (TCC), often described as "moving meditation," is a traditional Chinese mind-body exercise suitable for individuals of all ages. Mounting evidence demonstrates that TCC can improve physical functions, promote physical activity, and positively impact health and longevity. However, systematic learning is hindered by insufficient teaching resources, difficulties in imparting expertise, and learning environment constraints. TCC auxiliary training systems, an innovative means of human-computer interaction, provide a potential solution. Objective: This scoping review evaluates the research trends and clinical outcomes of TCC auxiliary training systems. Specifically, we compare the development tools, system design, and evaluation or validation processes used by different systems to guide future development in this research area. Methods: Following the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines, electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library) were systematically searched for studies in English from 2014 to 2024. Two reviewers independently extracted the data and used an adapted version of the Santos evaluation criteria to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The included studies were qualitatively summarized with respect to system design and evaluation verification. Results: Among the 2202 identified studies, 34 studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 24 were rated as medium to high quality. Desktop-based applications dominate the TCC auxiliary training system environment, comprising 38% (13/34) of the selected studies. The hardware and software components of TCC auxiliary training systems vary depending on the development objectives. Regarding system design, 76% (26/34) addressed all groups, with only a minority focusing on specific populations. Interaction design in TCC auxiliary training commonly incorporates human-computer interaction technologies, such as tactile, action, visual, speech, and multimodal interaction. Clinical validation is necessary to implement this system in clinical practice. Most reviewed studies were validated, 6 underwent acceptability validation, 21 underwent feasibility validation, and only 2 virtual reality-based systems underwent clinical efficacy validation, demonstrating their effectiveness in improving cognitive abilities and motor functions in older adults. Conclusions: The TCC auxiliary training system is an innovative health intervention in a rapidly advancing field. This scoping review, the first undertaken on this topic, systematically synthesizes current evidence regarding its design, applications, research trends, and clinical outcomes, thereby establishing a comprehensive foundation to guide and inform future research. However, the current evidence still faces issues such as methodological inconsistencies, insufficient sample diversity, and a lack of long-term effectiveness validation, which limit its generalizability and effectiveness in widespread applications. Future research should place greater emphasis on standardized reporting, applicability to diverse populations, and foster ethical considerations and interdisciplinary collaboration. This will facilitate the widespread deployment of the TCC auxiliary training system and ensure its sustainable integration into the field of health intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.