Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41428393›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025

Probabilistic-graph-based spatial context-aware framework for interpretable spatial omics denoising and augmentation.

Xianhan Qin, Chang Liu, Fei Gu, Xun Lan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xianhan QinSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Haidian District, Beijing 100084, China.
Chang LiuSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Haidian District, Beijing 100084, China.
Fei GuDamo Academy, Alibaba Group, No. 969 Wenyi West Road, Yuhang District, Hangzhou 310023, China.
Xun LanSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Haidian District, Beijing 100084, China.

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation 20201100463Biological Breeding-National Science and Technology Major Project 2023ZD04076National Natural Science Foundation of China 81972680Tsinghua University-Peking University Joint Center for Life Sciences 61020100119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatially resolved omics technologies offer unprecedented insight into tissue organization, yet current analytical methods face challenges in effectively handling technical noise while preserving biological heterogeneity. We present CadaST, an interpretable and unified computational framework that integrates spatially aware feature selection and an adaptive imputation strategy to address this limitation. By inferring the spatial molecular pattern for each feature and conducting pattern-guided aggregation, CadaST effectively denoises and augments spatial omics data while preserving sharp biological boundaries. This gene-centric approach robustly denoises data without the oversmoothing common to other methods. CadaST is versatile and highly effective, outperforming existing methods across diverse spatial technologies. It accurately resolves delicate anatomical layers in the brain, characterizes complex tumor microenvironments, and scales efficiently to large-scale developmental atlases. By providing a more accurate, interpretable, and scalable solution, CadaST represents a significant methodological advance for elucidating the principles of tissue architecture in health and disease.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGenomicsAlgorithmsBrainHumansTumor Microenvironmentdata denoisinginterpretable learningprobability graphspatial domain identificationspatially variable genesspatial omics

Identifiers

PMID41428393
PMCPMC12721081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.